[1. Call to Order]
[00:00:02]
IT'S OFF. YES. ALL RIGHT. OKAY. I'VE GOT 6:00. I'LL CALL THE JANUARY 13TH MEETING OF THE SHERWOOD PLANNING COMMISSION TO ORDER. PLEASE CALL THE ROLL. HOSKIN HERE. EVANS HERE. PATEL HERE. CLUFF. MARTIN HERE. WILLIAMS. DOZIER, HERE. FIRST ITEM IS THE APPROVAL OF THE
[3. Approval of December 9th , 2025, Meeting Minutes]
MINUTES FOR THE DECEMBER 9TH MEETING. ARE THERE ANY ADDITIONS? CORRECTION.QUESTIONS? COMMENTS? MAKE A MOTION. WE APPROVE THEM AS THEY WERE PREPARED. SECOND, HOSKIN EVANS, A PATEL, A MARTIN A DOZIER. ABSTAIN. SECOND. OKAY. THERE'S FOUR. I'M TRYING TO
[4. Approval of the Agenda]
KEEP UP WITH THESE FOR YOU. ALL RIGHT. APPROVAL OF THE AGENDA. THIS EVENING I WOULD GO AHEAD AND REQUEST A VOTE TO TABLE BOTH ITEMS UNDER OLD BUSINESS. THAT'S THE PRELIMINARY PLAT FOR CAMILLA ACRES AND ASSOCIATED SITE PLAN. OKAY. WE WILL NEED A MOTION IN A IN A SECOND AND A VOTE TO TABLE THOSE ITEMS TO ADJUST THE AGENDA. SO IF WE WANT TO TAKE THAT UP NOW, WE MOTION THAT WE TABLE THE ITEMS THAT ARE LISTED UNDER OLD BUSINESS. SECOND, THAT IS A MOTION IN A SECOND, MA'AM. HOSKIN EVANS A PATEL. HI, MARTIN. I OH DOZIER I OKAY. ALL RIGHT. OTHER THAN THAT, THE AGENDA STANDS AS AS IS OKAY. ELECTION OF CHAIRMAN. OKAY,[5. Election of Chairman]
I'LL OPEN THE FLOOR TO NOMINATIONS FOR CHAIRMAN FOR 2026. NOMINATE BLAKE MARTIN SECOND. ANY MORE NOMINATIONS? IT SEEMS LIKE WE HAVE A MOTION IN A SECOND. OKAY. EVANS DELOREY I PATEL, I MARTIN ABSTAIN. DOZIER I. OKAY. ELECTION OF THE VICE CHAIRMAN[6. Election of Vice-Chair]
FOR 2026. I NOMINATE CHARLES. WHAT? WE HAVE A NOMINATION FOR MR. CHARLES HOSKINS SECOND.OKAY WE HAVE WE HAVE A MOTION AND A SECOND FOR CHARLES HOSKINS AS VICE CHAIR. THAT'S SCARY. PLEASE CALL THE ROLL. ABSTAIN. EVANS DELOREY I PATEL. I MARTIN, I DOZIER I. I APPRECIATE YOUR VOTE OF CONFIDENCE UNTIL YOU'D HAVE TO CHANGE THEIR NAME TAGS. YEAH.
[7. Site Plan for Lots 1R and 11R, Carroll Heights Subdivision. Thomas Engineering, Agent.]
401. ALL RIGHT. ITEM NUMBER SEVEN ON THE AGENDA PLEASE. SITE PLAN FOR LOTS ONE R AND 11 R CARROLL HEIGHTS SUBDIVISION. OKAY. SO THIS FIRST ITEM ON THE AGENDA IS FOR A COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT ON TWO LOTS OF RECORD. YOU WOULD HAVE NOTED WITHIN THE STAFF REPORT, THERE ARE A NUMBER OF ITEMS AT THE TIME THAT REMAINING TO BE ADDRESSED. BUT WITH THAT WE DID RECEIVE REVISIONS YESTERDAY. BUT ALTHOUGH WE DID RECEIVE THE REVISIONS, STAFF STILL RECOMMENDS TO TABLE THE ITEM TO ALLOW TIME TO THOROUGHLY REVIEW THOSE REVISIONS. IN CONJUNCTION WITH OUR CONSULTING ENGINEER. BUT THE APPLICANT IS HERE TO SPEAK TO THE ITEM, AND I WOULD LIKE TO ALLOW THAT OPPORTUNITY IF DESIRED. MR. PARNELL. GOOD EVENING, THOMAS THOMAS ENGINEERING. WE DID. WE FEEL LIKE WE ADDRESSED ALL THE ITEMS AND UNDERSTAND STAFF. WE PUT THEM UNDER A LOW PRESSURE IN TIME. IF IT'S I WOULD LIKE TO YOU ALL CONSIDER GO AHEAD AND APPROVING IT JUST SO WE DON'T HAVE TO COME BACK TO YOU. THERE ARE TWO ITEMS I SEE IS KIND OF BIG ONES. ONE OF THEM WOULD BE THE ARCHITECTURAL RENDERING FOR THE BUILDING ON THE WEST SIDE, WHICH IS PROPOSED TO BE AN HVAC OFFICE, AND WE DON'T HAVE THOSE ELEVATIONS YET FROM ARCHITECT.THAT'S KIND OF A BIG ASK. SO IT TAKES QUITE A BIT OF WORK. AND THEN I THINK THE OTHER ITEM MAY BE WE ARE TOO CLOSE ON THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE PARKING LOT, WHERE I THINK WE'VE GOT LIKE 5.4FT AND WE NEED SIX. WE JUST WE'RE JUST TIGHT THERE AND WE NEED ALL THE PARKING WE CAN GET. IT'S A SMALL SITE. WE'VE MAXIMIZED THE BEST WE CAN WITH TURNING RADIUS AND STUFF LIKE THAT, BUT ALL THE OTHER ITEMS I FEEL ARE PRETTY MINOR. IF STAFF WANTS TO, IF IT IF YOU WOULD CONSIDER IT WITH CONTINGENCIES. IF NOT, WE'LL COME BACK TO YOU NEXT MONTH. IT YOU'RE GOING TO LEAVE IT AS TWO LOTS. YOU'RE NOT GONNA PUT IT BACK INTO ONE, OKAY. NO, IT WILL BE TWO. LOTS
[00:05:24]
WITH A COORDINATED ACCESS, EASEMENTS, THINGS LIKE THAT. THERE WILL BE AN AX. THERE WILL BE A SIDEWALK EASEMENT AS WELL FOR THE NORTHEAST CORNER. WE'LL COVER ALL THAT. THEN OBVIOUSLY THERE'S A VARIANCE ON THE AGENDA FOR. YES. ALL THE SAME. ALL THIS DOESN'T WORK UNLESS THAT VARIANCE IS APPROVED, RIGHT? CORRECT. SO THAT IS ONE OF THE THAT IS GOING TO HAVE TO BE ONE OF THE CONTINGENCIES, NO MATTER WHAT IT BEING ON THE ZONING ADJUSTMENT AGENDA NEXT.[8. Discussion: T. Rick's Service Station]
SO AGREED. I'LL MAKE A MOTION THAT WE TABLE IT TILL THE NEXT MEETING A SECOND OKAY. YOU HAVE A MOTION AND A SECOND TO TABLE THIS ONE UNTIL THE FEBRUARY MEETING. OKAY. THANK YOU.HOSKIN EVANS, A PATEL, A MARTIN A DOZIER I. OKAY. NUMBER EIGHT DISCUSSION T RICK SERVICE STATION. SO THIS NEXT ITEM ON THE AGENDA IS A DISCUSSION. THE REPRESENTATIVES ARE HERE TO SPEAK TO IT THIS EVENING. BUT EARLIER LAST YEAR IT WAS A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT. I'M SURE Y'ALL ARE FAMILIAR WITH THE LOCATION AND THE PROPOSED PROJECT, BUT THEY ARE HERE TO BASICALLY PRESENT BEFORE THE COMMISSION IF A NEW APPLICATION WOULD BE DESIRED OR NOT. SO I'LL LET THEM SPEAK TO THEIR REQUEST THIS EVENING. WELL, CAN I ASK A QUESTION BEFORE WE GET TO THAT? YES YOU CAN. IS THERE ACTUALLY AN APPLICATION THAT HAS BEEN FILED WITH THE CITY? THERE IS NO FORMAL APPLICATION BEEN MADE. THE 12 MONTH PERIOD HAS LAPSED, SO THEY ARE ELIGIBLE TO MAKE NEW APPLICATION FOR A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT. BUT WE DON'T HAVE THAT APPLICATION. NO, SIR. SO THERE'S NOTHING FROM THEM THAT'S BEFORE THE COMMISSION THEN? TECHNICALLY, NO. OKAY. NOT A FORMAL APPLICATION. THERE IS NO ACTION BY US TONIGHT AT ALL. THIS IS SIMPLY IF WE WANT TO HAVE A DISCUSSION OR NOT. NOW, THE QUESTION I ASK MR. COBB LAST WEEK, OR IS THIS COMMISSION IN THE BUSINESS OF ISSUING ADVISORY OPINIONS? IN MY TENURE OF EIGHT AND A HALF YEARS, THIS HAS NEVER HAPPENED THAT I CAN RECALL THAT SOMEBODY HAS BROUGHT SOMETHING UP FOR JUST DISCUSSION WITH, THAT. WE'RE NOT GOING TO ACT ON THAT.
WE DON'T HAVE A FORMAL APPLICATION FOR. OKAY, MR. COBB MAY REMEMBER SOMETHING. I DON'T REMEMBER ANYTHING SINCE. NO, I HAVE NO MEMORY OF WHETHER WE EVER DID THAT. IT'S ALWAYS BEEN THE POLICY THAT THEY NEED TO MAKE THE APPLICATION, LET STAFF LOOK AT IT AND JUST GO THROUGH THE NORMAL PROCEDURAL PROCESS. YEAH, I THINK YOU'D RUN INTO AN ISSUE OF IF AN APPLICANT COMES IN AND SAYS, HERE'S WHAT WE'RE THINKING ABOUT, AND THEY PRESENT THEIR PROJECT AND EVERYBODY SAYS, WELL, OKAY, THAT LOOKS GOOD. AND THEN WHENEVER IT GETS BACK, IT'S NOT WHAT WAS PRESENTED OR FOR WHATEVER REASON, THEY'RE GOING TO SAY, WELL, WAIT A MINUTE, WE HAD A PROMISED OUTCOME. AND, YOU KNOW, I DON'T THINK YOU WANT TO DO THAT, RIGHT. OKAY.
SO I GUESS MY NEXT QUESTION IS HOW DID THIS GET ON THE AGENDA TO START WITH, IF IT'S SOMETHING THAT WE DON'T ROUTINELY DO AS A COMMISSION, HOW DID THIS ITEM GET ON THE ON THE AGENDA? WELL, I HATE TO BE EVASIVE, BUT I CAN SPEAK TO THAT. OKAY. SO WHAT WE DID IS WE MET WITH THE APPLICANT OR THE OWNER OF THE PROPERTY NOW, AND WE HAD A DISCUSSION. NOW, THIS HAS BEEN NUMEROUS DISCUSSIONS IN THE PAST, EVEN LEADING UP TO THE PREVIOUS APPLICATION. AND THEY WERE KIND OF PULLING STAFF AND THEY ARE HERE TO SPEAK IF YOU HAVE ADDITIONAL QUESTIONS. BUT IT WAS THE RECOMMENDATION THAT THEY COME BEFORE TO SEE IF THAT WAS EVEN A POSSIBILITY, JUST FOR DISCUSSION ITEM. DUE TO THE OUTSTANDING NATURE OF THOSE, BASICALLY THE REASONS FOR DENIAL, IN THE LAST APPLICATION, THEY WERE PRETTY EXTENSIVE.
THERE WERE TRAFFIC CONCERNS AT THE INTERSECTION, THINGS OF THAT NATURE. THEY WANT TO SEE IF IT'S EVEN WORTH THEIR WHILE. IF THEY CAME IN WITH AN AMENDED SITE PLAN, POTENTIALLY TO ADDRESS ANY OF THOSE CONCERNS. AND THEY DID PROVIDE A CONCEPT THAT WAS INCLUDED IN YOUR PACKET AND BASED ON QUICK REVIEW. AND I WAS NOT I WAS ON MATERNITY LEAVE AT THAT TIME, SO I HAD TO GO BACK AND REVIEW MYSELF. THE ITEM. IT LOOKS LIKE THERE WAS A DISCERNIBLE DIFFERENCE WITH CERTAIN POINTS OF DENIAL, ALTHOUGH IT IS STILL AN ISSUE, POTENTIALLY WITH THE INGRESS EGRESS LOCATIONS IN PROXIMITY TO THE INTERSECTION. SO IT'S MORE SO A DISCUSSION AT THIS POINT. AND WE'VE HAD THOSE INTERNALLY. SOMETIMES WE SEEK OUT OTHER OPINIONS OF THE COMMISSION. IT'S YOUR CALL COMMISSIONER. YEAH. SO DO YOU WANT TO HEAR THE DISCUSSION OR DO YOU WANT TO WAIT TILL FORMAL APPLICATION. THAT'S THAT'S THERE'S NO APPLICATION. SO I DON'T THINK THERE'S A DISCUSSION TO BE HAD. AND I WOULD SAY THAT IT'S NOT STANDARD PRACTICE. OF COURSE, SOMETHING OF THIS NATURE. THIS IS A SPECIALIZED PROJECT THAT HAD IT WAS A CONDITIONAL USE. THERE WERE SOME CHALLENGES WITH THE SITE THAT I THINK EVEN MOVING FORWARD WITH THE NEW APPLICATION, THEY'RE STILL GOING TO PRESENT. SO THAT WAS MORE SO THE RATIONALE BEHIND IT. OKAY. SO DOES YOU. YOU WERE SAYING IS THAT THEY DO A FORMAL
[00:10:07]
APPLICATIONS. YOU REVIEW IT. AND THEN WE WOULD COME FORWARD TO THE COMMISSION WITH ANY OTHER ITEM THAT WE BRING BEFORE YOU FOR TAKE ACTION. TAKE THE NORMAL PROCESS. RIGHT. FORMAL APPLICATION IF THAT'S WHAT THE RECOMMENDATION. YEAH. YEAH. REVIEW THEIR REVIEW. ADDRESS THE COMMENTS UNTIL IT'S A SATISFIES THE STAFF TO BRING IT FOR HERE FOR A RIGHT FOR A FOR A VOTE. YEAH OKAY. SO DO WE NEED A MOTION ON THIS. NO THERE'S NO ACTION FOR US TO, TO TAKE I MEAN NO IT WAS JUST A DISCUSSION ITEM. THAT'S HOW IT MADE IT ON THE AGENDA. AT THIS POINT I THINK THE PATH FORWARD IS MAKE THE FORMAL, LET THEM MAKE THE FORMAL APPLICATION AND AND GO THROUGH THE PROCESS AND BRING IT TO THIS COMMISSION WHEN IT WHEN IT'S THROUGH THAT[10. New Business]
PROCESS. OKAY. MOVING ON THEN NUMBER TEN NEW BUSINESS. THE 2025 REPORT PLEASE. OKAY. SO AS YOU WOULD HAVE NOTED, IT WAS A VERY BUSY YEAR LAST YEAR, PROBABLY THE BUSIEST SINCE I'VE BEEN WITH THE CITY. SO I'M JUST GOING TO QUICKLY RECAP WHAT WE HAD ALL DONE WITH THE APPLICANTS AND THE COMMISSION STAFF TOGETHER. SO WE HAD SEVEN SITE PLANS, FIVE REZONE REQUESTS. WE HAD FIVE CONDITIONAL USE PERMITS, NINE RE PLATS, SEVEN FINAL PLATS, THREE PRELIMINARY PLATS, AND THEN WE HAD TWO COMPREHENSIVE CODE AMENDMENTS FOR OUR BUILDING DESIGN STANDARDS AND ACCESSORY DWELLING UNITS, ONE LAND USE PLAN AMENDMENT AND TWO PUD APPLICATIONS. IT WAS BUSY. JOB WELL DONE. CONGRATULATE TO STAFF ON A JOB WELL DONE. OH WELL THANK YOU. WE'RE ALL IN THIS TOGETHER. IT WAS IT WAS ALL DO THE HEAVY LIFTING. YEAH, THEY SURE DO. SO OKAY. ANY QUESTIONS ON THE REPORT. ALL RIGHT. ENTERTAIN A MOTION TO ADJOURN. MOTION TO ADJOURN. SECOND, CALL THE ROLL, PLEASE. HOSKIN EVANS I PATEL I MARTIN I DOZIER I ALL RIGHT. I'LL NOW CALL THE JANUARY 13TH MEETING OF THE SHERWOOD BOARD OF ZONING[1. Call to Order]
ADJUSTMENT TO ORDER. PLEASE CALL THE ROLL. CLIFF EVANS HERE. MARTIN HERE. WILLIAMS. DOZIER HERE. HOSKIN HERE. PATEL HERE. ALL RIGHT. FIRST ITEM ON THE AGENDA IS THE APPROVAL OF THE[3. Approval of November 10th, 2025, Meeting Minutes]
NOVEMBER 10TH MEETING MINUTES. ARE THERE COMMENTS, QUESTIONS, CORRECTIONS THAT NEED TO BE ADDRESSED OR A MOTION TO APPROVE IT AS WRITTEN? MAKE MOTION TO APPROVE AS WRITTEN.SECOND. EVANS, A MARTIN, A DOZIER, A HOSKIN. PATEL, A OKAY. ELECTION OF CHAIRMAN NOMINATE
[4. Election of Chairman]
MR. BLAKE MARTIN FOR CHAIRMAN. OKAY, WE HAVE ONE NOMINATION. OKAY. SO MR. PATEL JUMPED, JUMPED THE GUN AND MADE IT A MOTION AND A SECOND. SO PLEASE CALL THE ROLL. EVANS II MARTIN ABSTAIN. DOZIER I HOSKIN I PATEL I. ELECTION OF VICE CHAIR. I NOMINATE CHARLES HOSKIN. WE[5. Election of Vice-Chair]
HAVE A NOMINATION FOR MR. HOSKINS ANY MORE? SECOND. OKAY. MR. MR. EVANS SECONDED THAT.EVANS I MARTIN I DOZIER I HOSKIN ABSTAIN. PATEL. HI. ALL RIGHT. ITEM NUMBER SIX VARIANCE
[6. Variance at 1800 East Kiehl Avenue. Thomas Engineering, Agent.]
AT 1800 EAST KEELE. OKAY. SO. OH YES I DO. OH WE ALMOST FORGET IT EVERY TIME. YES. SO DO YOU SWEAR TO TELL THE WHOLE TRUTH IN YOUR TESTIMONY TO THIS COMMISSION? I DO. OKAY. THANK YOU. YOU MAY PROCEED. OKAY. SO THIS ITEM WAS CONCURRENTLY SUBMITTED WITH THE SITE PLAN APPLICATION THAT WAS TABLED AT THE COMMISSION MEETING. SO WITH THIS REQUEST, IT IS A REQUEST FOR REDUCTION FROM THE REQUIRED 40 FOOT FRONT YARD SETBACK IN COMMERCIAL ZONING. SO THIS IS JUST THIS IS A SITE PLAN THAT WAS SUBMITTED. AND YOU CAN SEE ON THE SCREEN HERE, HERE'S THE 40 FOOT BUILDING LINE. AND THERE IS AN EXISTING STRUCTURE ON THIS LOT ONE R. AND IT DOES ROUGHLY COINCIDE WITH THIS PROPOSED SETBACK. SO I'M GOING TO SWITCH GEARS REAL QUICK. AND THIS REQUEST I WILL QUICKLY NOTE THIS CAME AFTER A MEETING WITH STAFF. THE APPLICANT AND STAFF MET. WE DID DISCUSS THE CONSTRAINTS OF THIS LOT AND THE FUTURE REDEVELOPMENT[00:15:03]
SPECIFICALLY OF THIS LOT ONE R, BUT ALSO BASED ON THE TOPO CHALLENGES OF THIS LOT 11 R THE APPLICANT IS HERE AND THEY HAVE MORE ON THE GROUND KNOWLEDGE OF THE SITE ITSELF. BUT STAFF DOES RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF THIS VARIANCE REQUEST TO REDUCE THAT SETBACK. IT WILL CREATE UNIFORM DEVELOPMENT OVER TIME, AS THESE PROPERTIES DO TURN OVER FROM RESIDENTIAL USES TO THEIR COMMERCIAL USES. ALONG THE EAST KILL CORRIDOR, I CAN TAKE ANY QUESTIONS OR IF THE APPLICANT WISHES TO SPEAK, WE CAN GO THAT DIRECTION. SO THE CURRENT BUILDING SETBACK SHOWN IN THE PICTURE IS WHAT 21 IT? IT'S PRETTY CLOSE. SO HERE ON THE SCREEN IT'S KIND OF HARD TO SEE BECAUSE OF THE SHADOW. BUT THIS IS ROUGH ESTIMATES. AND IF YOU'RE FAMILIAR WITH PAGES YOU ALWAYS PROVIDE YOURSELF A 3 TO 5 FOOT BUFFER. BUT IT IS ROUGHLY MEASURING FROM THE PROPERTY LINE TO THIS EXISTING STRUCTURE. LET'S JUST SAY 22FT. BASED ON ITS CURRENT BUILT CONDITION. THEY ARE PRETTY SMALL LOTS. SO THE VARIANCE REQUEST WOULD DEFINITELY PROMOTE DEVELOPMENT IN THIS AREA. ARE THEY TEARING THIS BUILDING DOWN? ARE THEY GOING TO USE THAT BUILDING? THAT'S WHAT I WASN'T CLEAR ON. THIS SAYS NEW BUILDING. AND AND BASED ON THE DIMENSION IS THE NEW BUILDING WOULD BE ROUGHLY THE SAME DISTANCE FROM THE ROAD AS THE CURRENT ONE. YES, BECAUSE THIS ONE'S TURNED MORE LONG WAYS TO KEAL AVENUE.VERSUS WHAT ABOUT THE BUILDINGS ON THE OPPOSITE SIDES OF THAT PROPERTY? HOMES, GO. LET'S SEE.
SO THIS IS THIS IS A RESIDENCE. AND THEN THIS LOT IS UNIMPROVED LAND. AND THEN YOU GO ACROSS FAIRVIEW HERE TO THE EAST. AND THAT'S A RESIDENCE AS WELL. OKAY. SO OVER TIME AND I WILL QUICKLY NOTE THIS IS A REQUEST LIKE THIS IS NOT UNCOMMON. I DID SOME DIGGING. THERE IS A STRIP CENTER FURTHER DOWN ON EAST KEELE THAT HAD A SIMILAR VARIANCE TO THE SETBACKS, JUST BASED ON THE NARROWNESS OF THE LOT AND THE BUILDABLE AREA. THERE ALSO HAVE BEEN PROPERTY OWNERS IN PROXIMITY WHO HAVE INQUIRED TO REZONE TO COMMERCIAL IN THE FUTURE. NOT ANYTHING IMMEDIATE. IT'S BEEN IDEAS, BUT THIS WOULD BE SOMETHING THAT WE LOOK AT, MAYBE MOVING INTO THE FUTURE TO REDUCE THOSE SETBACKS, TO GET THAT COMMERCIAL CORRIDOR FUNCTIONING IN ITS INTENT. A LITTLE BIT OF A CONSTRAINT OF TAKING A RESIDENTIAL LOT AND MAKING A COMMERCIAL BECAUSE THE SETBACKS CHANGE. SO. ANY MORE QUESTIONS? OR IS THERE A.
MOTION FOR THE FROM THE FROM THE COMMITTEE, FROM THE BOARD MAKE A MOTION THAT WE APPROVE THE VARIANCE. THAT IS WE HAVE A MOTION. DO WE HAVE A SECOND SECOND? MR. TAYLOR? MR. EVANS, ANYONE ON THE SECOND? CALL THE ROLL. EVAN CELERY I MARTIN I DOZIER I HOSKIN A PATEL I. ANY
[8. New Business]
OLD BUSINESS NONE ON THE AGENDA ANY NEW BUSINESS. I ACTUALLY DO HAVE A NEW BUSINESS ITEM. WE HAD SEVEN VARIANCES IN 2025. OKAY. VARIANCE REQUEST. WE'LL WE'LL PREFACE IT THAT WAY.THAT'S NOT APPROVAL I DON'T REMEMBER APPROVING THAT MANY BUT THAT WAS THAT WAS WHAT WE'RE REQUESTED. YOU'RE SAYING FOUR WERE APPROVED. THREE WERE DENIED OKAY. YES. OKAY. ANY OTHER NEW BUSINESS ENTERTAIN A MOTION TO ADJOURN. MOTION TO ADJOURN. SECOND. EVAN. SORRY I MARTIN I DOZIER I HOSKIN A
* This transcript was compiled from uncorrected Closed Captioning.